From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GCDZh-0004lO-4S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:52:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7DAp7K9028476; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:51:07 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7DAp6uY029186 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:51:07 GMT Received: from [62.147.153.16] (lns-bzn-48f-62-147-153-16.adsl.proxad.net [62.147.153.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2710264776 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <44DF03B5.2050705@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:49:25 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060704) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] frontend needed to make Gentoo/embedded a viability References: <200608121950.39655.vapier@gentoo.org> <1155458628.6438.38.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1155458628.6438.38.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: aa3d84e4-0700-4461-ad7a-35fc2adddf28 X-Archives-Hash: e4a3d8b51f616239d3259bb60fc99ee3 Ned Ludd wrote: >> what do you guys think ? stupid idea ? > > Not silly.. I'd tie it into (lx)dialog/Xdialog and skip anything to do > with catalyst as it tends to be cumbersome for embedded use (plus GNAP > already exists). using the classic dialog method will provide the most > familiarity to what buildroot users already expect. Yes, I would stay away from catalyst. GNAP makes extensive uses of it and inherits its design/drawbacks : you'll probably want something smaller and less integrated. Using catalyst you would end up with something like GNAP anyway :P -- Koon -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list