From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdGkR-0001bG-LH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:56:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4245CE02F2; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f177.google.com (mail-yx0-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2323DE02F2 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe7 with SMTP id 7so4182459yxe.32 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:56:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Me3BvChJRWYxfEF6MA/OY/IqQISb8+jAJV7xVXbzQw=; b=KYvKQIqP05ve30yYkdqCEbjtuCF24acxBFAr3bU/tMVsCj8yxOLcXxJwe9M/xzTPBt d6R/WQ1rjpdoHbT39NcmVQ9gzACFBeFrP5gRXzLwamXBpT1/w/zzYF+z0OT8DLHDi/40 1XaE3Br9M7dYT6efCxODcje+xup3wDVT4LRpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uvbwtcu9/C7mWOVjkygOps72mrN57GBxZ3N1sOZ1kbk4KS+VzAJvO1Fh2seL7+qZN/ jc4Eui2nxwVLqZCkxp5c9vbfnjrGNym7XWZ7k9r+F4pBT4FXTJSOHMthVtbd+aC4P+OW TbNIIMofuM1T2ms7+9xsw96JY2wFoD0nfGRUM= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.48.27 with SMTP id v27mr7179238ybv.291.1250571397865; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:56:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56d259a00908121433h4e76971eqc2b917051cd10b48@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ea34a000908120721q4ea2007bobe61748f447afab3@mail.gmail.com> <56d259a00908121433h4e76971eqc2b917051cd10b48@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:56:37 -0400 Message-ID: <3ea34a000908172156t2554ca70r534d8633ed57966@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] pxa270 cflags? From: Christopher Friedt To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 36c068a6-4718-4188-b2da-136f7481c837 X-Archives-Hash: 70b19dd32a4837e74417d63f56783f32 Hi Martin, Thanks for your reply On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Martin Guy wrote: > Did you run into problems with cpu=iwmmxt? cpu=iwmmxt works fine, aside from an oddity with one of the later mplayer builds from gentoo - compiling by hand with CFLAGS="-mcpu=iwmmxt" generates an mplayer with iwmmxt, but running the ebuild makes the mplayer configure script somehow fail the iwmmxt tests, even with the same cflags. It's no biggie though. Incidentally, did you ever get into the OpenMoko hardware? It's turning out to be a bit of a disappointment. KoolU really hasn't been maintaining their Android port. I've tried OM2008,9, and SHR, and they all seem to fall short of the potential of the device. IMHO it really boils down to the Glamo nastiness. I'd really like to get involved with designing a _good_ handset from the ground up, if only there was some sort of monetary incentive. I really think OM needs to buckle down if they're going to be releasing a new model based on Samsung's 6410, and I mean including a UI that makes a statement relative to the market. Really, having a 3G modem is almost standard these days. I would suggest just using the same chip 'everyone' else is using, which is the msm7200a, but it's not very open in spite of the good linux driver support and being packed with so many goodies on the inside. Aside from that, there's good ol' omap, but TI got rid of all of the baseband silicon from their chips a while ago. C