public inbox for gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Some good words for Gentoo embedded?
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:20:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101221162012.27392.qmail@stuge.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D10C0B0.8010602@wildgooses.com>

Ed W wrote:
>> "Why Gentoo?"
>
> I like gentoo for situations where:
> - Skilled developer available
> - Customisable solution is desired
> - Tightly controlled deployment environment
> - Repeatable build environment required
>
> I think gentoo is far less acceptable if there isn't a skilled developer 
> available to help maintain and develop it... Probably that's my main 
> suggestion on how to size your project?
> 
> However, if that developer/administrator is available, then Gentoo is a 
> marvellous solution for quickly building few MB custom solution, or a 60MB 
> virtual server base installation, or whatever other customised environment 
> you desire?

This is very perceptive, and excellent advice!

I believe firmly in "owning the problem" and for that, Gentoo is a
very good fit. I know many who fiercly resist owning any problem
whatsoever, and they do fine anyway (even better than me) and for
them obviously Gentoo is not at all a goo fit because they would have
to make lots of decisions they do not want to.

Abstracting a little; the more requirements there are, the more
likely it is that without Gentoo, it would be neccessary to start
re-inventing various bits and pieces that Gentoo already offer.

Sometimes requirements come only later, when a production process has
already been established, and can not comfortably be replaced. That's
a bad situation to be in. It will be painful no matter what, but
often people choose the lengthy pain that means sticking with the old
"distribution" living with a less-than-useful environment and
reinventing tools and processes, instead of ripping off the band-aid
and making a switch to Gentoo or something else that fits the
project.


//Peter



  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-21 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-09 20:18 [gentoo-embedded] Some good words for Gentoo embedded? Kfir Lavi
2010-12-09 21:42 ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-09 23:02 ` David Ford
2010-12-30  6:52   ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-12-30  7:17     ` Peter Stuge
2010-12-30 10:49       ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-12-21 14:58 ` Ed W
2010-12-21 16:20   ` Peter Stuge [this message]
2010-12-23  8:34     ` Kfir Lavi
2010-12-23 11:17   ` [gentoo-embedded] virtual server profile Arkadi Shishlov
2011-02-26 11:58     ` Ed W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101221162012.27392.qmail@stuge.se \
    --to=peter@stuge.se \
    --cc=gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox