From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-3543-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OxknF-00011i-5y
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:08:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EB8CE0E01
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:08:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EFAE0762
	for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C75D1B40EB
	for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] JTAG (Linux) article
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:37:23 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.35.4; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <4C8FA55E.8090409@tampabay.rr.com> <4C8FF873.4070302@tampabay.rr.com> <20100914234420.4848.qmail@stuge.se>
In-Reply-To: <20100914234420.4848.qmail@stuge.se>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2610687.XTWtLXk0kn";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201009201337.23521.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: d1704f1f-b80b-485c-9930-f08a12eaddc9
X-Archives-Hash: b1fc694bdf77310075c3d648e89bedee

--nextPart2610687.XTWtLXk0kn
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, September 14, 2010 19:44:20 Peter Stuge wrote:
> wireless wrote:
> > > There haven't been any more upstream releases, although there is
> > > definately upstream activity. I guess a git ebuild would be nice.. :)
> >=20
> > http://openocd.berlios.de/web/?m=3D201002
> > this shows version 0.4.0:
> >=20
> > OpenOCD v0.4.0 released Monday, February 22nd, 2010
> >=20
> > ARM looks to be the most active platform for openocd
> >=20
> > portage has version ~0.3.1
>=20
> Oh sorry! I forgot that not even 0.4.0 is in portage. :\ But I do
> suggest a git version. Upstream development is pretty stable.

i guess someone should step up to be a maintainer for openocd.  i have no=20
personal interest in it as we use urjtag at my job, so that's what i watch=
=20
over (up and down stream).
=2Dmike

--nextPart2610687.XTWtLXk0kn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
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=xgKd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2610687.XTWtLXk0kn--