From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OKZOF-0000zd-FX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:04:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B7F5E0CBE for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.birdnet.se (foo.birdnet.se [213.88.146.6]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E53E2E0B3C for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18484 invoked by uid 501); 4 Jun 2010 15:56:21 -0000 Message-ID: <20100604155621.18483.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:56:21 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] ref bug 297229 (virutal/libiconv vs sys-libs/uclibc[iconv] vs sys-devel/gcc) Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org References: <4C078710.8060808@wildgooses.com> <1275606120.2949.3.camel@hangover> <4C08E724.3080605@wildgooses.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C08E724.3080605@wildgooses.com> X-Archives-Salt: 1a0b512b-107c-4755-81c1-f64ca474dac1 X-Archives-Hash: 1e62c5fc9eff88bb78f69764c645db46 Ed W wrote: > I'm still not sure I understand why I don't just do this "properly" > and either use iconv in uclibc or libiconv (and gettext)? Is it big? Is it neccessary? Usually it's a high priority to take away every last thing that is not absolutely neccessary. //Peter