[gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[josé Alberto Suárez López]

Hi,

The Google summer of code is yet open, so maybe somebody is interesting
in some ideas for GNAP[1]

- upgrade system support
- squashFS packages
- crossdev support
- MIPS64 support
- any other nice idea...

So if anybody is interested in help just email me.

regards

[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/gnap.xml

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Ned Ludd]

On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:48 +0100, josé Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The Google summer of code is yet open, so maybe somebody is interesting
> in some ideas for GNAP[1]
> 
> - upgrade system support
> - squashFS packages
> - crossdev support
> - MIPS64 support
> - any other nice idea...
> 
> So if anybody is interested in help just email me.
Bass if I can make a request..
Please mail the lists. 
Embedded is rated pretty high in things our users are interested in (top
20). So if you are a student or a vendor with access to students and
have bright ideas please share them with all of us.

http://staff.osuosl.org/~cshields/gentoosurvey/



> regards
> 
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/gnap.xml
> 
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[josé Alberto Suárez López]

Updated:

the list is order more proirity to less, the number means difficult (for
me :P)

- crossdev (2)
- squashfs pkgs (1)
- upgrade live system (1)
- union-fs (2)
- MIPS64 port (1)
- feature modular system (2)

who is interested reply to this msg

> 
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/gnap.xml
> 

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Philipp Riegger]

On 22.03.2007, at 16:00, josé Alberto Suárez López wrote:

> - crossdev (2)
> - MIPS64 port (1)

I think, theese to would be nice. I want to do that. I would probably  
write something like "and port it to mips64, mips or arm as a proof  
of concept" since i can not be 100% shure to really get access to  
mips64.

Philipp (stoile)

--
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 298 bytes --]

On Wednesday 21 March 2007, josé Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> The Google summer of code is yet open, so maybe somebody is interesting
> in some ideas for GNAP[1]

isnt GNAP built via catalyst ?  so most of these features really dont look 
specific to GNAP at all (nor should they be)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]

On Saturday 24 March 2007 08:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007, josé Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> > The Google summer of code is yet open, so maybe somebody is interesting
> > in some ideas for GNAP[1]
>
> isnt GNAP built via catalyst ?  so most of these features really dont look
> specific to GNAP at all (nor should they be)
Answering a question that I'm not really sure is a question at all...
Yes it is using Catalyst so either it is just integration work making GNAP 
work with already existing features or stuff has to be implemented in 
Catalyst.

-- 
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Jose Alberto]

El sáb, 24-03-2007 a las 03:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Wednesday 21 March 2007, josé Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> > The Google summer of code is yet open, so maybe somebody is interesting
> > in some ideas for GNAP[1]
> 
> isnt GNAP built via catalyst ?  so most of these features really dont look 
> specific to GNAP at all (nor should they be)
> -mike

the crossdev idea of course is mainly in catalyst, so the rest is more
in the gnap side.

regards

--
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --]

On Saturday 24 March 2007, Jose Alberto wrote:
> El sáb, 24-03-2007 a las 03:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> > On Wednesday 21 March 2007, josé Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> > > The Google summer of code is yet open, so maybe somebody is interesting
> > > in some ideas for GNAP[1]
> >
> > isnt GNAP built via catalyst ?  so most of these features really dont
> > look specific to GNAP at all (nor should they be)
>
> the crossdev idea of course is mainly in catalyst, so the rest is more
> in the gnap side.

well, it'll probably be best that if/when you start working on the 
cross-compile support on catalyst, we do it together and/or over the 
gentoo-embedded list since ive already started working on this ...

no point in having you do a bunch of cross-compiling work for catalyst to only 
have it shot down ;)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Philipp Riegger]

On 26.03.2007, at 07:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> well, it'll probably be best that if/when you start working on the
> cross-compile support on catalyst, we do it together and/or over the
> gentoo-embedded list since ive already started working on this ...
>
> no point in having you do a bunch of cross-compiling work for  
> catalyst to only
> have it shot down ;)

Sounds great.

I'll write my application today and then hopefully we can work  
together soon.

Philipp

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] GNAP in Google SoC

[Philipp Riegger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 848 bytes --]

Wrong email address, therefore i resent it.

On 26.03.2007, at 07:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:

>> the crossdev idea of course is mainly in catalyst, so the rest is  
>> more
>> in the gnap side.
>>
>
> well, it'll probably be best that if/when you start working on the
> cross-compile support on catalyst, we do it together and/or over the
> gentoo-embedded list since ive already started working on this ...
>
> no point in having you do a bunch of cross-compiling work for  
> catalyst to only
> have it shot down ;)
>

Hi Mike.

I am the student working on the cross compile support for gnap. Could  
you give a short status report on what is done and what needs to be  
done? Do you have documentation or sources/patches i could have a  
look at?

What could i do to get this running, where should i start?

Thanks,
	Philipp (stoile @ Freenode)


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 186 bytes --]