[gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[r1]

Hi All,

I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ? or Does an
new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?

Thanks for your help.


R1.
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Erwan Bracq]

Sorry, for the sender name. It should be better now.

r1.

r1 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
> could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ? or Does an
> new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
> R1.
>   

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 310 bytes --]

On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
> could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?

no, i had it killed

> or Does an 
> new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?

your e-mailing the new list now
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Ned Ludd]

On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
> > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
> 
> no, i had it killed
> 
> > or Does an 
> > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
> 
> your e-mailing the new list now
> -mike

Mike, 
Can you please add the list back.
This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.

-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Kevin F. Quinn]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:28:06 -0400
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the
> > > mail could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
> > 
> > no, i had it killed
> > 
> > > or Does an 
> > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
> > 
> > your e-mailing the new list now
> > -mike
> 
> Mike, 
> Can you please add the list back.
> This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.

Perhaps a more general gentoo-cross list would be better, for all
cross-building efforts using glibc.

-- 
Kevin F. Quinn

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1024 bytes --]

On Friday 14 July 2006 08:25, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:28:06 -0400 Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the
> > > > mail could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
> > >
> > > no, i had it killed
> > >
> > > > or Does an
> > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
> > >
> > > your e-mailing the new list now
> >
> > Can you please add the list back.
> > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.
>
> Perhaps a more general gentoo-cross list would be better, for all
> cross-building efforts using glibc.

i dont really see much use in forking mailing lists when we see small traffic 
on each one ... it isnt like it's confusing to pick through ...

maybe one day when we grow larger, but atm i think we think we're bigger than 
we really are ;)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 744 bytes --]

On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
> > > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
> >
> > no, i had it killed
> >
> > > or Does an
> > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
> >
> > your e-mailing the new list now
>
> Can you please add the list back.

no, it rarely got traffic

> This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.

i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while 
we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Erwan Bracq]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
>>>       
>>>> I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
>>>> could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
>>>>         
>>> no, i had it killed
>>>
>>>       
>>>> or Does an
>>>> new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
>>>>         
>>> your e-mailing the new list now
>>>       
>> Can you please add the list back.
>>     
>
> no, it rarely got traffic
>
>   
>> This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.
>>     
>
> i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while 
> we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc
> -mike
>   

Hi,

> i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while 
> we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc
> -mike

I agree that uClibc is focused for embedded system and should be
preferred to glibc but now  some customers prefer glibc on embedded
system for some psychological reasons  (most of them believe that uClibc
is not enough ready). Furthermore I will not be surprised that we will
continue to use glibc because NAND/NOR chip memory capabilities are
growing and for specific mobile products we can now find HDD inside.

R1.
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Ned Ludd]

On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: 
> On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
> > > > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
> > >
> > > no, i had it killed
> > >
> > > > or Does an
> > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
> > >
> > > your e-mailing the new list now
> >
> > Can you please add the list back.
> 
> no, it rarely got traffic
> 
> > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.
> 
> i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while 
> we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc

It's not a matter of intentional cock blocking it's more a matter 
of what we (embedded) are agreeing to support. Native glibc 
compiles fall under the realm of normal gentoo.


> -mike
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]

On Saturday 15 July 2006 13:23, Ned Ludd wrote:
> It's not a matter of intentional cock blocking it's more a matter
> of what we (embedded) are agreeing to support. Native glibc
> compiles fall under the realm of normal gentoo.

sure, but all ports for embedded processors fall in the realm of embedded ;)

a bit of a line blur here, but since i'm going to be maintaining it either 
way, i'm a little biased :p
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Erwan Bracq]

Thanks.

R1.

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
>   
>> I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
>> could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
>>     
>
> no, i had it killed
>
>   
>> or Does an 
>> new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
>>     
>
> your e-mailing the new list now
> -mike
>   

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list