From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErL3y-0005EN-24 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:04:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBRK1Lwj013801; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRK1K6Q007003 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:01:21 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErL26-0007H5-5f for gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:02:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 8848 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2005 15:02:19 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2005 15:02:19 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] glibc-2 status Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:03:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <1135690617.29642.186.camel@nc> <1135706560.8475.29.camel@onyx> In-Reply-To: <1135706560.8475.29.camel@onyx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512271503.05406.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: eafb82af-28e7-4e7e-aec4-9255e0c3dcb5 X-Archives-Hash: 96102487ed96eea9750e7697383ef2c5 On Tuesday 27 December 2005 13:02, solar wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? > > Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. > This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem > moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. considering said developer has been afk for quite a while, why dont i just go ahead and include the patch in our ebuilds (especially since upstream has accepted it) -mike -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list