[gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test

[gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test

[Douglas Campos]

How can it be done? Any hope?

PS: I've already done the /etc/portage/package.unmask thang, and no clues

Thanx

Douglas
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:04:43AM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
> How can it be done? Any hope?
> 
> PS: I've already done the /etc/portage/package.unmask thang, and no clues

it isnt package.masked thus package.unmask makes no difference

just add this line to your /etc/portage/package.keywords:
sys-libs/uclibc -*
-mike
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:10:48PM +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:04:43AM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
> > How can it be done? Any hope?
> > 
> > PS: I've already done the /etc/portage/package.unmask thang, and no clues
> 
> it isnt package.masked thus package.unmask makes no difference

err, it is package masked on current 2005.1 profiles, so i guess if you're 
using 2005.1 you'll need to package.unmask too :)
-mike
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test failed :(

[Douglas Campos]

Mike Frysinger wrote:

>On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:10:48PM +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>  
>
>>On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:04:43AM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>How can it be done? Any hope?
>>>
>>>PS: I've already done the /etc/portage/package.unmask thang, and no clues
>>>      
>>>
>>it isnt package.masked thus package.unmask makes no difference
>>    
>>
>
>err, it is package masked on current 2005.1 profiles, so i guess if you're 
>using 2005.1 you'll need to package.unmask too :)
>-mike
>  
>
/etc/portage/package.keywords:
sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28 -*

/etc/portage/package.unmask
=sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28

backup ~ # emerge -ptvu =uclibc-0.9.28

These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies  
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=uclibc-0.9.28" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your 
request:
- sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28 (masked by: profile)

Any clues?
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test failed :(

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:39:49PM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=uclibc-0.9.28" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your 
> request:
> - sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28 (masked by: profile)

put this into your /etc/portage/profile/packages:
-<sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28
and that should do it
-mike
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test failed :(

[Douglas Campos]

Mike Frysinger wrote:

>On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:39:49PM -0200, Douglas Campos wrote:
>  
>
>>!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=uclibc-0.9.28" have been masked.
>>!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your 
>>request:
>>- sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28 (masked by: profile)
>>    
>>
>
>put this into your /etc/portage/profile/packages:
>-<sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28
>and that should do it
>-mike
>
>  
>
it's done
thanks
-<sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28
-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-embedded] unmasking uclibc-0.9.28 for test failed :(

[Christian Heim]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 230 bytes --]

On Tuesday 08 November 2005 16:39, Douglas Campos wrote:
> /etc/portage/package.keywords:
> sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28 -*
Try =sys-libs/uclibc-0.9.28 -*

-- 
Christian Heim <phreak@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer - vserver

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]