From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-4028-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1QsDGh-0003eT-Rk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:24:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 794C121C25F; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D13421C258 for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.240.70.167] (smb-rcdg1-01.wifihubtelecom.net [213.174.115.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 595E81B4024 for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Re: manually creating manifests with RESTRICT="fetch" From: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <CAHNvW1L6i1y3-K02ktQswyXsxWN_vaWOCKz8S+-6fAefSa9_oQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF4BF-RhUSsBa3_raofGSBJZPJGSvfQGw=6xetAXrw_wg5MbVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4BF-QbQrTEYuHiZuSiOZXhNuA6rhwe4m5wfib_KwK=d5NyOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHNvW1Lg6hzRBcaWpYPtmoQbGeeke+bhgcFhuras6W1ZyPUSmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4BF-TY4u+LAJ2pyYbDTP7ew3ttker88WdHR4Cahg3y0EdsCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHNvW1L6i1y3-K02ktQswyXsxWN_vaWOCKz8S+-6fAefSa9_oQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:17:55 +0400 Message-ID: <1313237875.7527.19.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 61e2754a2a46e5e1b8dfb289e437d087 =D0=92 =D0=A1=D0=B1=D1=82, 13/08/2011 =D0=B2 10:14 +0300, Kfir Lavi =D0=BF= =D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > I wouldn't doubt that it was a bug in the portage version I'm > using. > It's been 43 days since my last emerge --sync, but I can't > update ATM > because I don't want to break any APIs in the (rather large) > project > I'm building right now. Upgrading portage does not breaks API. > Oh well - problem has been solved anyway. If something still requires FETCHCOMMAND, I really encourage you to open bug at bugs.gentoo.org. > I would also forward this message to gentoo-dev.=20 Oh, no! :) Bug reports should go to bugs.gentoo.org. With kind regards, -- Peter.