From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPLJB-0007rN-Qr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:03:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 795BBE0CAB for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7154DE0BF9 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.185.127] (unknown [63.65.129.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E341B4040 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] Re: emerge --root : users not created From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4C1A5413.8080606@verizon.net> References: <1276166368.2012.571.camel@pr-laptop> <1276268908.1875.29.camel@pr-laptop> <4C1A5413.8080606@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:39:16 -0700 Message-ID: <1276803556.19773.1.camel@hangover> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 05284248-5a8b-42e5-af28-ec440d448cc0 X-Archives-Hash: 835f08c9c5119caaafa3020e232a96a4 On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 12:57 -0400, P. Levine wrote: > On 06/14/2010 04:09 AM, Sven Rebhan wrote: > > 2010/6/11 Marcus Priesch : > >> Hi sven, > >> > >> wouldnt it be enough to have the patch included in gentoo's shadow > >> ebuild - as i think its mainly relevant for gentoo folks - at least in > >> the meantime, until the patch gets accepted upstream ?! > > > > Well, talk to the Gentoo maintainer of the shadow suite. :-) IIRC, it was > > clearly said, that the patch has to go through mainstream, but you can > > try nevertheless. IMHO the patch really _should_ go upstream and be > > reviewed there as it might be relevant for security stuff. > > > >> as i assume this patch alone is not enough - as it needs tweaking the > >> eclass providing the eadduser & co functions also ... and therefore it's > >> hard to put in an overlay ... or ?!?! > > > > The procedure would be: > > 1. Get the patch accepted either upstream or in the portage tree. > > 2. Find a good check to distinguish --chroot enabled and disabled shadow > > 3. Modify the eclass accordingly. > > > > So, start with 1. and the rest will happen automatically... ;-) > > > > Sven > > > > > > I'm currently trying to upgrade the patch to the latest shadow svn head. > > I'm having a problem that I might have to post on gentoo bugs, but I'd > like to post it here to make sure I'm not overlooking anything. I > started a new cross-build of armv4l-softfloat-linux-gnueabi with > crossdev. After installing the toolchain, using emerge-wrapper --init, > modifying make.conf, etc..., all emerges with > ROOT=/usr/armv4l-softfloat-linux-gnueabi/ in the environment cause > portage to use the --quiet flag. I don't have the flag in > PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS. I've tried deleting /var/cache/edb and > ${ROOT}var/cache/edb, to no avail. I can't use FEATURES="python-trace" > to debug because the --quiet flag seems to override it. All thats > visible is "myopts {'--quiet': True, '--buildpkg': True, '--verbose': > True, '--oneshot': True, '--debug': True, '--root-deps':'rdeps'}". I > already searched gentoo bugs. Does anyone know if there was a change in > portage that would cause this, or am I overlooking something? > > -P. Levine Check to see if the version of crossdev you are using has the -q flag in /usr/bin/cross-emerge. If so you can remove it from there. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux