From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LEmsW-00042x-Ax for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D380E04D3; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D105DE04D3 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so2421557ewy.10 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:39:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZVg8wFVo1Se5dbfjTC3BML4rDRtOk050SAjt8il6hfo=; b=j/e4cFNCcxnZ7ZwPcJKsTiRe2Fd5sx8O+1rj9+KUenhUpNM6w1E7Lhv6hkZ7hWV029 tWYdGpJ2LYh8aMXWxvMqC9Sa5kBjGRJPgJCrg/INSTl5zpIN/baTPPaJi9GGyackaZp0 X4VCLisycDke2JBlEDSLl0baGFnOArNjsYwlI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=LpH0aetl9TE0VcLhKVXdSDk2NjuADTPfvSBMNFRm76k00Fpbp5yWvMfDqzZtYtL+6s PkR2P4ExBjrMK9lJCXXswMCkA6r2lj4q3EGaPXFYSx5W+n2C1LFlnkgwsaCTbhw7pEvP rtkOmt3iEm4XFwU4go228si5dKsSc2n3q7ii0= Received: by 10.210.43.11 with SMTP id q11mr2813072ebq.144.1229960369397; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:39:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.6? ([196.205.217.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm38276910ewy.78.2008.12.22.07.39.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:39:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: Ahmed Ammar Subject: Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: [gentoo-embedded] maverick-crunch queries From: Ahmed Ammar To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Cc: linux-cirrus@freelists.org In-Reply-To: <56d259a00811170921u1ab90f7x1aa80cef1978d9ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <1217492163.3767.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <56d259a00810130537ie4b11aofb498d5e2aeca32f@mail.gmail.com> <1226929479.3361.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <56d259a00811170921u1ab90f7x1aa80cef1978d9ef@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:39:16 +0200 Message-Id: <1229960356.28926.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7949b2e2-43af-4c22-bc47-c8f86dad313f X-Archives-Hash: 276fc4760a80352473cfe7f8a5334e1f On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 17:21 +0000, Martin Guy wrote: > There is support called arm-crunch-unwind.patch in the later tarballs > that is independent of the other patches and it should apply OK to the > earlier GCC versions too. > You can see it my most recent complete set under > http://martinwguy.co.uk/martin/crunch/gcc-4.3.2-patches > though this isn't prodution quality (sometimes Internal Compiler > Errors) > If you'd like to try adding that patch and running some tests with > unwinds, I'd be glad to hear of your results . Sorry I've been very busy lately and didn't have a chance to try the patches before you released them publicly. Although, I have tried the above link and i get a 403 'Forbidden' error. I was trying to find the arm-crunch-unwind.patch in an attempt to try to understand/debug/solve the following problem: I have compiled a brand new tool-chain using your 4.3.2 patch series but I am hitting a certain bug (that also existed with the older 4.1.2 patches); an assembler error when trying to compiler certain c++ files. The assembly generated is: .LCFI141: .save {mv8} <-- Error: register expected cfstrd mvd8, [sp, #-8]! I don't know if the arm-crunch-unwind.patch was supposed to solve this, as it's not included in the public patches. I could give you the source code that is causing this bug too but it's part of a large library and therefore didn't want to clutter this message with it's details (and patches which are needed to get it to cross-compile). Best Regards, -- Ahmed Ammar (b33fc0d3 [at] gentoo.org)