From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GPPwq-0002KA-SJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:42:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8IKfFeu020194; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:41:15 GMT Received: from mail42.e.nsc.no (mail42.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.42]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8IKfFP5028329 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:41:15 GMT Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org ([213.234.126.131]) by mail42.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k8IKfDkm004507 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:41:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC593FA51 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17425-03 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nc.nor.wtbts.org (unknown [192.168.65.211]) by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CC73FA44 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [gentoo-embedded] hardened gcc-4.1 and uclibc From: Natanael Copa To: gentoo-embedded Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:41:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1158612071.13312.79.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at wtbts.no X-Archives-Salt: d7da757d-7367-42db-91c5-7722da207056 X-Archives-Hash: e4795f71b0d46d34dff461e70cfd904d Hi, I tried to upgrade my uclibc/hardened to gcc-4.1 today but it failed. I discovered the the hardened flag was unset. is i possible to run hardened uclibc with gcc or should I just drop that for now? should gcc-4.1 be masked in the uclibc/hardened profile? Thanks! -- Natanael Copa -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list