From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-embedded+bounces-1053-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1G1ntl-0005l0-6N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:25:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6FHNqpp008818; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:23:52 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6FHNoYL008385 for <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:23:50 GMT Received: (qmail 16994 invoked by uid 210); 15 Jul 2006 13:22:07 -0400 Received: from 64.192.55.166 by skinny (envelope-from <solar@gentoo.org>, uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.2/1599. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.1.3. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.55.166):. Processed in 0.063529 secs); 15 Jul 2006 17:22:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.99.99.11?) (64.192.55.166) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2006 13:22:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ? From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200607142240.35343.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <44B5FF0A.7040108@free.fr> <200607132334.47382.vapier@gentoo.org> <1152865686.7672.13.camel@localhost> <200607142240.35343.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:23:39 -0400 Message-Id: <1152984219.24093.4.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-embedded+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-embedded.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 677d2867-f201-4473-a941-aa9b57380c76 X-Archives-Hash: 1a5d923e8d2c9fe1ab4e6d1a63260689 On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote: > > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail > > > > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ? > > > > > > no, i had it killed > > > > > > > or Does an > > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ? > > > > > > your e-mailing the new list now > > > > Can you please add the list back. > > no, it rarely got traffic > > > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc. > > i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while > we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc It's not a matter of intentional cock blocking it's more a matter of what we (embedded) are agreeing to support. Native glibc compiles fall under the realm of normal gentoo. > -mike -- Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> Gentoo Linux -- Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list