Re: [gentoo-embedded] gentoo ARM mailing list still alive ?

[Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>]

On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: 
> On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail
> > > > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ?
> > >
> > > no, i had it killed
> > >
> > > > or Does an
> > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ?
> > >
> > > your e-mailing the new list now
> >
> > Can you please add the list back.
> 
> no, it rarely got traffic
> 
> > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc.
> 
> i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so while 
> we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc

It's not a matter of intentional cock blocking it's more a matter 
of what we (embedded) are agreeing to support. Native glibc 
compiles fall under the realm of normal gentoo.


> -mike
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list