From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErMBu-000687-Rj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:17:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBRLEFrS031006; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:14:15 GMT Received: from mail42.e.nsc.no (mail42.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.42]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRLEEfq000905 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:14:14 GMT Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org ([213.234.126.131]) by mail42.nsc.no (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBRLFlRE005628 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:15:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4523FA07 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:15:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32026-04 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:15:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from nc (unknown [192.168.65.211]) by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D703FA03 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:15:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-embedded] glibc-2 status From: Natanael Copa To: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200512271503.05406.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1135690617.29642.186.camel@nc> <1135706560.8475.29.camel@onyx> <200512271503.05406.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:15:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1135718147.20922.6.camel@nc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at wtbts.no X-Archives-Salt: 9fe519d8-aba5-4e34-8dd0-ec32632d4dda X-Archives-Hash: ae22c459391244e029c625c223ce522d On tir, 2005-12-27 at 15:03 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 13:02, solar wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > > Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? > > > > Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. > > This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem > > moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. > > considering said developer has been afk for quite a while, why dont i just go > ahead and include the patch in our ebuilds (especially since upstream has > accepted it) I would appreciate if we could go forward, yes. But it would be good if it could be done without making the "people issue" worse. > -mike -- Natanael Copa -- gentoo-embedded@gentoo.org mailing list