From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QTsj4-0000MA-3Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:37:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE5EA1C09C; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15EA1C09C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-166-255.san.res.rr.com [76.93.166.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nightmorph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE7E31B4017 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 02:35:57 -0700 From: Joshua Saddler To: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] Re: okupy, a Django rewrite of www.g.o Message-ID: <20110607023557.05d5b440@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: <4DE7783D.8060508@gentoo.org> References: <4DE76236.5010704@gentoo.org> <4DE7783D.8060508@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/DZbEd.OPFmXUhAnVB08M=YU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8e81917a2264d3a6ee2b3a678f41cd1c --Sig_/DZbEd.OPFmXUhAnVB08M=YU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:47:09 +0200 Jan Kundr=C3=A1t wrote: > On 06/02/11 12:29, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > Sure, I contacted Josh who showed much interest to my idea, and > > Infra to make sure they (we) are willing to replace gorg >=20 > Hi Theo, thanks for clarification and for your reply. Too bad Josh > did not pass the word along the GDP. Given how much stuff he does, > I'm sure he was just swamped with work. Indeed. Actually, I thought I mentioned it a time or two, on one of my infrequent visits to #gentoo-doc or the mailing lists, but it may have slipped my mind entirely. Basically, if it would ease contribution without disrupting the experienced contributors' current GuideXML workflow, I'm all for it. Maintaining all this stuff by myself sucks. Okupy is an independent project, as many efforts to revamp and expand our website/docs have been, so I don't see that it'll do any harm. Okupy development doesn't seem like it would interfere with maintaining our existing documentation. I would like a few other devs be willing to answer questions from the Okupy crowd; I'm not on IRC enough to provide realtime feedback. --Sig_/DZbEd.OPFmXUhAnVB08M=YU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3t8QAACgkQxPWMzpKk6kObuACfdh2/OTUQAgwF/roKpNrY+Un+ j4MAoKeHNlhzaQnXiXU8ZyFJd0iQQ6z3 =fGLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DZbEd.OPFmXUhAnVB08M=YU--