From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PltZX-0004kC-Lb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:37:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65B7DE0A61; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0D5E0A61 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-166-255.san.res.rr.com [76.93.166.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nightmorph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CE3D1B417A for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:37:02 -0800 From: Joshua Saddler To: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] trads.xml updates available? Message-ID: <20110205173702.221ace60@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: <4D4DDD54.2060604@gentoo.org> References: <4D4DDD54.2060604@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/_kAOI1I7UbUddl8lhN+HcYS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 25d5ce08af66eeb0b20ff0cddcc548f3 --Sig_/_kAOI1I7UbUddl8lhN+HcYS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 00:29:24 +0100 Tobias Heinlein wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I just noticed that there were some docs missing in our (the > Germans') trads.xml and I wonder if there are any updates on it > publicly available. I have been adding new entries and removing old > ones along with the changes to metadoc.xml and apparently I missed > a few in the past or just forgot about updating trads.xml. >=20 > How do the other translation teams handle it? How do you decide > about the files' priorities? >=20 > Thanks, > Tobias >=20 > [1] http://www.gentoo.de/trads/trads-de.xml Beats me. I don't remember if I've ever had to make changes to the file. Maybe neysx did back in the day, but he's nowhere to be found. I'd say just do what works for you and fits with the rest of our docs. Any other help you need from me, just ask. There's a doc someplace that lists the relative priorities of the docs -- handbook was at the top of the list. --Sig_/_kAOI1I7UbUddl8lhN+HcYS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk1N+0AACgkQxPWMzpKk6kPTyQCgwXooj6oA570LWv2+moh0mRdl aU8An3FlBjbyci5872+c4/B4PV71c1Xf =h3nc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_kAOI1I7UbUddl8lhN+HcYS--