From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELGl7-00012a-Jc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:00:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8U8qbhr013020; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:52:37 GMT Received: from fep30-app.kolumbus.fi (fep30-0.kolumbus.fi [193.229.0.32]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8U8qaqq031314 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:52:37 GMT Received: from pingviinilohhari ([80.186.115.28]) by fep30-app.kolumbus.fi with ESMTP id <20050930090008.MIPA13482.fep30-app.kolumbus.fi@pingviinilohhari> for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:00:08 +0300 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:59:53 +0300 From: Flammie Pirinen To: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents Message-ID: <20050930115953.11905c57@pingviinilohhari> In-Reply-To: <433C0B12.3000103@gentoo.org> References: <43206D3A.5030406@gentoo.org> <432A89E5.8040205@gentoo.org> <433C0B12.3000103@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo, Finnish Translation team X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: /oQZK78/tYZ%quDrY&EoYY_koL#pFsE)B*SNk~g5O|*p~`e^O0D^\( Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-doc@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Fri__30_Sep_2005_11_59_53_+0300_R2vsrXh.7HFfjd7O; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 774820d0-44f4-4558-9496-04a1c3d6c452 X-Archives-Hash: 34c874d4859128bcc85c0c84165750d9 --Signature_Fri__30_Sep_2005_11_59_53_+0300_R2vsrXh.7HFfjd7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2005-09-29, Xavier Neys sanoi, jotta: > Disclaimer & redirect > () Yea () Nay Nay for delayed redirect. It's confusing and causes only usability problems. It's also proprietary kludge to HTTP protocol, which has never been approved to standard for a good reason. Either use instant redirect with proper HTTP headers or nothing at all. Having automatic delayed redirect provides nothing useful. If the user misses the disclaimer and starts reading the document instead he will be very annoyed and confused when it suddenly disappears, if user sees the disclaimer he will be perfectly capable of activating the link when he has finished reading the disclaimer and not any time sooner or later. > Note about more recent English version > () Yea () Nay Yay, of course. --=20 Flammie, Gentoo Linux Documentation's Finnish head translator. --Signature_Fri__30_Sep_2005_11_59_53_+0300_R2vsrXh.7HFfjd7O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDPP6UUdHmbQdGmqkRAjvQAJ9aGX2Gw+gawOOfjQtDk307PFQn2ACcChBT N8PsrNNdAZMDNyAOWSJDwJE= =iRkc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Fri__30_Sep_2005_11_59_53_+0300_R2vsrXh.7HFfjd7O-- -- gentoo-doc@gentoo.org mailing list