From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j53DXu1T031290 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:33:56 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F56BC84B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01775-88 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.osuosl.org (shell.osuosl.org [140.211.166.149]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1647CBC662 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by shell.osuosl.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 038392F401C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8661420004 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Deedra Waters To: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] meeting time, round something... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <429FF195.7020009@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-devrel@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: a7050da1-375f-4faa-a5a7-f307cc35a1f5 X-Archives-Hash: ce3d251045a6e746f64b7b87d4c6d177 Donnie suggested splitting out the whole complaint/ disciplinary part of devrel into it's own small project/group. I fully agree with this. We'll add this to the meeting and deal with that first. If the rest of devrel agrees, and I hope they do:) then we'll leave it up to that group to decide how to handle complaints since that group won't be part of devrel. On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Deedra Waters wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:09:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Deedra Waters > Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] meeting time, round something... > > Let's just focus on the whole bugs thing right now. > > Let's have a second devrel meeting on the 14th to set the final > complaint policy in place and we can talk about your docs then. will > that work for you? > > My mother is gonna be in corvallis tuesday afternoon, and while i love > gentoo, i don't want to be stuck in the devrel meeting for 2 hours while > we hash out 2 large topics. > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 22:58:45 -0700 > > From: Donnie Berkholz > > Reply-To: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] meeting time, round something... > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Deedra Waters wrote: > > > Ok all, I'm proposing a meeting for tuesday at 1800 utc. Finals will be > > > over by then, so hopefully this time will be a bit better for devrel > > > folks. I'm sure that you can guess what the topic of this meeting will > > > be... > > > > > > complaints and bugs. > > > > Can we add those docs I wrote up [1] to the agenda, or would this work > > out better if it were just focused on this topic? > > > > I saw a comment or two on them in the last meeting log, and I'd like to > > address them this weekend. > > > > Thanks, > > Donnie > > > > 1. http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/proj/devrel/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFCn/GVXVaO67S1rtsRAsdcAJ9j+hN8RTsxQ4Xn7GY3F5Q1uS36bwCfQghj > > ZnWSz1SQccAIrsp4eZCJ+o8= > > =GV6G > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - dmwaters@gentoo.org Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org -- gentoo-devrel@gentoo.org mailing list