* [gentoo-devrel] Re: [gentoo-core] Michael Cummings (mcummings) and the return
[not found] ` <20051104181644.GA13282@toucan.gentoo.org>
@ 2005-11-04 18:51 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-11-04 18:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Stubbs @ 2005-11-04 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Seemant Kulleen; +Cc: gentoo-devrel
On Saturday 05 November 2005 03:16, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:03:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > 69 days since his farewell mail, by my count.
>
> Oops, you're correct. I don't have -core archives, and I based that on
> a comment he made on his retirement bug (the comment was dated
> September).
No probs...
> > While I like mcummings - he took perl-related portage functionality
> > (including a portage of the bugs ;) and improved it - I personally don't
> > really like the special casing of when procedures need and apply and when
> > they need not. If the procedures are a problem then fix them (which
> > should be a team effort); don't just bypass them when you feel they don't
> > apply.
>
> A more than fair point. Perhaps we should talk about what the rules are
> for returning devs. I'm holding his reinstatement in the meanwhile.
I'd prefer he be reinstated actually - I'm pretty sure we have no hardcore
perl people at the moment. I'm just pointing out that if the current policies
and/or procedures don't fit the bill, they should be revised rather than be
side-stepped.
CC'ing gentoo-devrel@g.o as I imagine that's where discussion of what should
be done now and/or in the future should lie...
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-devrel@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-devrel] Re: [gentoo-core] Michael Cummings (mcummings) and the return
2005-11-04 18:51 ` [gentoo-devrel] Re: [gentoo-core] Michael Cummings (mcummings) and the return Jason Stubbs
@ 2005-11-04 18:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2005-11-04 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-devrel; +Cc: Seemant Kulleen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
| I'd prefer he be reinstated actually - I'm pretty sure we have no
hardcore
| perl people at the moment. I'm just pointing out that if the current
policies
| and/or procedures don't fit the bill, they should be revised rather
than be
| side-stepped.
In part because esammer's returning bug has also been held up (nobody's
fault). =)
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDa65YXVaO67S1rtsRAmSqAKDicE9VCwO3GrnISVnRrDbU4XIjkwCfQLPT
ytH6gDRfpamJplcmOo0CzbU=
=PCQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-devrel@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-04 18:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20051104175235.GA26403@toucan.gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <200511050303.56053.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <20051104181644.GA13282@toucan.gentoo.org>
2005-11-04 18:51 ` [gentoo-devrel] Re: [gentoo-core] Michael Cummings (mcummings) and the return Jason Stubbs
2005-11-04 18:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox