From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j57CPvlj000815 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:25:57 GMT Received: from [216.200.97.58] (helo=polylepis.inforead.com) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Dfd9z-0002Mr-Tj for gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:26:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-devrel] Proposal From: Ferris McCormick To: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <42A4DB0E.30905@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZFXdHUOkU0h6f2IFEJ8s" Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:26:23 +0000 Message-Id: <1118147184.7209.75.camel@polylepis.inforead.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-devrel@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-devrel@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: 9809e28a-1c2d-4dd6-a684-773db3ba323f X-Archives-Hash: a09bd9b90893a0b4ddebe5ca77d4da14 --=-ZFXdHUOkU0h6f2IFEJ8s Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:07 -0700, Deedra Waters wrote: > Only question i have about this is why can't managers be on the > investigative team. In a sense, i can sort of see why not, but i also > think that they should be allowed. Devrel does have a high content of > managers in it, though that number isn't as high as it used to be. > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Michael Tindal wrote: >=20 Realistically, there might not be a choice. That depends on the composition of devrel, of course, and if the population count forces managers to be investigators, then so be it. It's better not, however. Ideally, an appeals panel should work only from the record before it and the arguments made by the parties involved. Personally, if I were on an appeals panel hearing a case I had previously investigated, I'd have trouble putting aside opinions I had formed during the appeals process (but I emphasise this is related to my own personal makeup). If nothing else, the ultimate outcome of any case decided on appeal would look more legitimate if investigation, adjudication, and appeal were handled by separate bodies. Or, maybe I'm just being to legalistic here? >=20 > --=20 > Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastruct= ure - > dmwaters@gentoo.org > Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org >=20 Regards, Ferris --=20 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc) --=-ZFXdHUOkU0h6f2IFEJ8s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCpZJvQa6M3+I///cRAlmyAJ9s9uXkM2AwaU28LiebMQp66y+LmQCg5SNU bKa4fHzgqsbTewvGXghFkCk= =zbH9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZFXdHUOkU0h6f2IFEJ8s-- -- gentoo-devrel@gentoo.org mailing list