From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-devhelp+bounces-82-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1N4ILU-0000YH-Jt
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:06:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83CC3E0997;
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:06:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B00DE0997
for <gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:06:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E563267061
for <gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:06:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.154
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.154 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.555,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nkZWqZESV2FN for <gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA4D670E6
for <gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1N4ILG-000857-1Q
for gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:06:22 +0100
Received: from athedsl-374302.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.14.28])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:06:22 +0100
Received: from realnc by athedsl-374302.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:06:22 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-devhelp] Re: Calling the default implementation of a function
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:06:01 +0200
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <hchua5$2af$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <hchm76$bpr$1@ger.gmane.org> <4AEC77DC.6070608@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Development-related help <gentoo-devhelp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-374302.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091019 Thunderbird/3.0b4
In-Reply-To: <4AEC77DC.6070608@gentoo.org>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 51ade1b5-67ab-48ca-9526-649b6741d9a3
X-Archives-Hash: 976cc97fecb74ab86a8d930b5e4b5ed9
On 10/31/2009 07:46 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
>> Is there a way to call the default implementation of a function inside
>> the ebuild-specified one?
>>
>> What I mean is:
>>
>> src_prepare() {
>> if [ "$PV" == "9999" ]; then
>> ./autogen.sh
>> else
>> src_prepare() # Default from eclass.
>> fi
>> }
>>
>> Possible?
>>
>>
>>
>
> 1. i suggest to use eautoreconf instead of those homegrown scripts.
I know, but it doesn't work in this case. In short: doesn't work :P In
long: This is a dual ebuild (can be used as live as well as regular) for
app-misc/mc, and mc really needs its own autogen.sh; it does weird stuff
in there, much more than what eautoreconf does.
> 2.<eclass>_src_prepare will call the src_prepare phase from<eclass>
Thanks. What's the default eclass of ebuilds that don't have any
"inherit" line in them?