From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JR75Q-0006dr-0S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AB4FE049D; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA115E049D for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7333E644EA for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.021 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.511, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54zpDL6LBttA for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD901648CF for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JR75C-00040J-I3 for gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:02 +0000 Received: from 82.153.193.35 ([82.153.193.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:02 +0000 Received: from slong by 82.153.193.35 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:35:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-devhelp] Re: Bugzilla Questions Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:17:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <47B95025.7020203@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Development-related help X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.193.35 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 5fcc07b3-3438-460a-8bdb-0f1f54001893 X-Archives-Hash: e57152ddd83bfc60bfd171cc76ba0743 Thomas Kahle wrote: > how to handle the following situation. A packet fails to build or run. I > try the ~ Version and this works. > This the state of the panels and pagers in gentoo :) > I have this problem (on my machine) for: perlpanel, suxpanel, obpager, > fspager, fbpager, fbpanel... and maybe more. > fbpanel and obpager are fixed since yesterday (see bugzilla). > > Shall I > *) file a bug on the stable version > *) Request stabilization for the ~ version (if it does not have other > open bugs) > *) contact anyone else ? > > I found that, if I file a bug against a stable version of some package, > Jakub will ask me to test the ~version. Then usually this version works. > I'd file a stabilisation request; there's a tip here about it: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4814915.html#4814915 That would be most useful for others imo. -- gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org mailing list