From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S0fir-0000rh-Ef for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:57:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB511E0F93; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B003E0F93 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p548D2A54.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.42.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE54F6443E for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F46A80B.10801@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:56:43 +0100 From: Thomas Sachau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Development-related help X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories References: <4F3FAA4F.1010208@gentoo.org> <4F3FF65E.1030603@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9C73F36832AA94DAE968F17F" X-Archives-Salt: a8c5254c-5aa1-4b4f-9ec5-717c24f7d226 X-Archives-Hash: 2341c6e15d5f03b0653a09a4ef4d537a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9C73F36832AA94DAE968F17F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James Cloos schrieb: >>>>>> "TS" =3D=3D Thomas Sachau writes: >=20 > TS> I just tried libgit2 (dev-libs/libgit2-0.16.0) and it installs just= fine > TS> for me, so i cannot reproduce this (base version for my portage is > TS> 2.2_alpha87), what are your versions of portage and libgit2? >=20 > As I implied by saying master, -9999. libgit2 is also 0.16.0. >=20 > I tried updating portage just before posting, the log says that was fro= m > 9997bb9c81e07 to 4a85888920244. >=20 > My last successful install of libgit2 was 0.15.0 back in October, so th= e > change which made portage start failing ebuilds which try to dodoc dirs= > was done sometime in the last four months. >=20 > TS> P.S.: No need to cc me, i am subscribed to this list. >=20 > I'm used to lkml-style etiquette; include everyone who has posted in th= e > CC. It tends to be the norm on technical lists, and is what gnus does > by default if I reply to the copy sent directly. I (now) see that this= > lists munges reply-to, so this reply honours that.... >=20 > -JimC Not much i can help with, since i cannot reproduce this myself. Maybe you ask portage maintainers on irc in #gentoo-portage or on the related mailing list about this. --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --------------enig9C73F36832AA94DAE968F17F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk9GqBEACgkQG7kqcTWJkGdJRgP+Iqhh76cjL9yEb5KgHc2ciLrd ddN3vAA89BjYgaQDJHnuNWa0/LyubSdRe+7Dj1/B0RyZMLB3e4lCejxa5JaZA+7l tNhIuzt3pL2bkQWapbHrN9e49ETD6olLVHELKK8P+jVBoL2FQVLnSP8y4LkRoT0r FnA0NU7RzFiUaqKz8k8= =vUIx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9C73F36832AA94DAE968F17F--