From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-devhelp+bounces-153-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1RykX7-0000iP-MK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:41:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFF79E0AD2; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2557FE0AD2 for <gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p548D2D55.dip.t-dialin.net [84.141.45.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tommy) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6A6A64C94; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F3FAA4F.1010208@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:40:31 +0100 From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20111223 Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-devhelp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Development-related help <gentoo-devhelp.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-devhelp@lists.gentoo.org CC: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-devhelp] dodoc vs directories References: <m3ipj5gmk4.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> In-Reply-To: <m3ipj5gmk4.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5597121FC952BDEF898D0100" X-Archives-Salt: 22886460-6de0-445f-bb1b-ef7e32fcaaaf X-Archives-Hash: 2f9c71d217a0498c720b27b562c6360a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5597121FC952BDEF898D0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James Cloos schrieb: > It seems that dodoc recently has lost recusivity in portage master. Unless you found something special with EAPI-4, then there is nothing lost. dodoc never had the ability to work on directories in EAPI<4. There was just a bug in portage, which did not let dodoc die, when it was called on a directory. This now should, according to the mentioned bug 356389, show a QA warning and at some later point die as it should have done from the beginning. >=20 > Several ebuilds (including in the main tree) now fail because of that. Please give me some common example for such a failure. >=20 > Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D356389 implies that the g= oal > is only to qawarn, not error, when passed a directory. And dodoc itsel= f > seems to work that way. So if dodoc does just qawarn, how should ebuilds now fail with dodoc called on directories? >=20 > But doins does not (cf: >=20 > :; grep -C3 '$x is a directory' /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/d= oins >=20 > for the details). doins was never ment to work on directories, unless you used the -r switc= h. >=20 > Is this a bug in portage or should I submit bugs, blocking 356389, for > each failure? I currently cannot really see your problem, maybe you mixed some facts about dodoc and doins? Otherwise, please clarify this. --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --------------enig5597121FC952BDEF898D0100 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAk8/qlUACgkQG7kqcTWJkGcUHQQAoAbJjWXa0nXssutoyn/x4ruu DfzW0a8L4eYgFnvAmvWDxn8cMG0FN8QRyrhBezJxgyJ9K+DUgcl0n2GVugisTJFa dnmncHKB68w4FrYZYYkltod2l4xLZdm47yEUNtAJJczjYnT14h+G2iHkb8yKJh40 jnJ+4AqlPw+dlEk3L9A= =D+N0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5597121FC952BDEF898D0100--