From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40461-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NyBPX-00018x-RJ
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:01:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2E3AE093E;
Sat, 3 Apr 2010 22:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com (mail-qy0-f180.google.com [209.85.221.180])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F71E0091
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 22:01:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so202347qyk.26
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.229.46.11 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1270330558.15538.4.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net>
References: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org>
<1270330558.15538.4.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:01:40 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8ad572e359950636
Received: by 10.229.88.193 with SMTP id b1mr6407363qcm.27.1270332100714; Sat,
03 Apr 2010 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <x2ib41005391004031501g3f0393eaj20e630875a9a85ec@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 272f2285-b1fb-458b-b98c-f725047ca686
X-Archives-Hash: b00a3df48979aaea416b054d5fa2121c
2010/4/3 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>:
> Le samedi 03 avril 2010 =C3=A0 12:50 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty a =C3=A9cri=
t :
>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
>> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
>> disabling later?
>
> You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly
> managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are
> for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would
> be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face
> of the reported like this do we ?
Thats why I think a bugzilla LATER keyword is just as effective; but
people doing bugzie searches would no longer exclude these types of
bugs on accident.
-A
>
> --
> Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo
>