From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyqZ5-0004Yh-Kw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:58:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 505AFE0966; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com (mail-ew0-f227.google.com [209.85.219.227]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5EAE0962 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so1106425ewy.10 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=xnQPY8lUD9EskE7ak7fznDz9VHOqPpnjk75RGoxd7PU=; b=vAyJyREfSQEwBATtve/OAA4/MIpkBXlhlJk1tBJ8zAXcDQF8pNDzBFjRcmong48F56 tlLcabI2t0oby8wpcMHBrRueCfmj5Rl04GvquamMdslWmPWh0EywHFrzenGmOjrdF5Um 5/kBDkpRAOjBudtJzHsNF8F/K4fNKA22idicM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=alzs+J3HHtrUSN2mYtQy+NFbJ8qBJKcxLEHSZT432lRLUG6+Vzx9uaQzeDPpt8yFIp Ku9ors5tiqsLldfBQyO24v8U6SBRoTRpRNiTvmZpvyL9pytKXu6HzupdEt93iBWyaSpI 8PuXxcjkE7WJIqX0fe5+hcqV/S7DBUBb0W4eU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.108.71 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BB75DE3.7070308@gentoo.org> References: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> <4BB75DE3.7070308@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:58:17 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fca96ee9938403b7 Received: by 10.213.55.148 with SMTP id u20mr1716547ebg.85.1270490297164; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 6b2075aa-bb3c-4214-9831-0464a4f5d88f X-Archives-Hash: 3a453ce48e857b424b070face9c546a8 On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > I disagree. Resolved LATER is useful to some maintainers that want to > fix that bug, but don't have time or don't find the issue to be a > priority at the moment. By marking it LATER they're acknowledging the > bug exists and needs to be taken care of. Reassigning the bug to yourself (or the herd) if necessary, accepting it, and then explaining what/who/why/etc in a comment is the way to go in that case. No system, however good it is, will replace proper communication. Denis.