From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mons.uio.no (mons.uio.no [129.240.130.14]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BDEABDAB for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:58:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nommo.uio.no ([129.240.222.179]) by mons.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7) id 17X6jq-0003qV-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:58:34 +0200 Received: from terjekv by nommo.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 17X6jq-0005nM-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 22:58:34 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stable and unstable branches. References: X-URL: http://terje.kvernes.no/ Organization: do you Gentoo? From: Terje Kvernes Date: 23 Jul 2002 22:58:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 88134ee4-cbc8-44b7-9bf7-0ca895b627a7 X-Archives-Hash: 31999ea8b356efa46a2ea7244f5da097 Karl Trygve Kalleberg writes: [ with regards to the stable / unstable branches ] > In exactly what form such a split will manifest itself is still not > know, but rest assured we're working on it. it might only be me, but I'd love to eavesdrop. :-) -- Terje