From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from pat.uio.no (pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81035AC506 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 12:26:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nommo.uio.no ([129.240.222.179]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7) id 17Yroh-0003dJ-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:26:51 +0200 Received: from terjekv by nommo.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 17Yroh-0001LI-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:26:51 +0200 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.1/3.2 References: <20020728050711.GB5651@dhcp101047.res-hall.nwu.edu> <200207281244.45546.verwilst@gentoo.org> <3D43F0B5.9030203@gentoo.org> X-URL: http://terje.kvernes.no/ Organization: do you Gentoo? From: Terje Kvernes Date: 28 Jul 2002 19:26:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3D43F0B5.9030203@gentoo.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: beadb4e6-0077-43d6-8b1f-6868e53f2f92 X-Archives-Hash: 7b1bb318963ce91a247b15b0243d3f71 Doug Goldstein writes: [ ... ] > 3.2 is labeled by GNU to be 100% multi-vender compliant with the C++ > ABI now. Which is the core prob with the new gcc releases. By > skipping straight to 3.2 we'll avoid 2 problem transitions.. 1 from > 2.95 to 3.1 and then from 3.1/3.1.1 to 3.2 instead we'll have 2.95 > to 3.2. that sounds like a very good idea. although it leave people like me (with 3.1) in need of a --rebuild-tree. oh well, I haven't tried that before. ;-) > As one of the gcc-3.1/gcc-3.2 Gentoo guys I support this plan (was > one of the ones calling for it among the devs) and I'm working hard > with all the other guys to send upstream patches to developers to > make sure their applications are ready for the new gcc-3.2 > platform. (this will benefit all distros). great work! it's great to see people putting in community work and not just thinking about their own little sphere. *applause* and again, thanks! -- Terje