From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C869138334 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C7A4E087B; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355EEE083E for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F18E34B191; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:18:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev , licenses Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing References: Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 21:17:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:09:20 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: e61c8aca-2808-4935-b4ae-8acf38d914f7 X-Archives-Hash: 8f23224870fe5a0f1f443f3ef7312c4a --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl2Gd2EACgkQwwkGhRxh wnNbnwf+M+ypSrduGXASuSPuiBRrNNdtEsL9qMmG0eK3pW+UDUF+Q9Mnx+X5XtAQ e4hOBoVSgF590l5fALtaZuVGKLgz+4TyCibjr7FagB82s4vdeieFYQF9/N19b86S g5S9DFt0DHhKVhCj0h/B9kQWzMfpraJeqXknzRWa1j9lvrweZ/mzhCrwPTNhOM/r Iy+TwcDq0O/YByzZed99Oi/olpaB+5dFNBu8gNeNxPae7yq8ac0X1r2IELzZBqwi LjSdOCslet+Y7Px27i+/Lu7r6Ou3jF7H59crIlvRw5wpSnI83gez8jnVkyq/JC/z mBKS2JX0Zd34HysH4PVxSUZ4doRi2w== =a011 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--