From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B17138334 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA792E09C2; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7D3E0921 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1E334C4A9; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:54:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Andreas Sturmlechner Cc: pr , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News Item v3: sys-fs/cryfs-0.10.2 update References: <2364611.2xGvymeTQd@tuxk10> <4711034.d950OIdMpC@tuxk10> <1746509.WGgRJKmoJg@tuxk10> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:54:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1746509.WGgRJKmoJg@tuxk10> (Andreas Sturmlechner's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:38:24 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f76226b1-f7d4-4dcd-8956-0604423ad5c6 X-Archives-Hash: dbc3f17c3d33c03813e76052fe2c6def --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > News-Item-Format: 1.0 I'm aware that it's not required by policy to use the newest format, but is there any particular reason for not using 2.0? More generally, can we deprecate News-Item-Format 1.0? Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl22yM4ACgkQwwkGhRxh wnPMUwgAmta5ImFgEYV0NFv5vrSqtCH3yMIDX8CXLuJLdnyLfzsCVEb/T4LOFmbH Ifpy2RaTbJy2hgYlHd7UhTCkNfa4tVuYDwZu72n+w5qSUOmN0R+oDWt519voIsxU KvThI2pdqLZ+YS8tqOWokKpitlUApKDbRSs6GvSbdesPkb5Gq5ojPC9xXU45eCPr ZCbiHNElWhAEQ7tRtqp0NyKh+3BIjPWjLOv5coDwFyR/IboyWPr8NY8bmGfmePxJ s+S8KDPhx7CzKQpl2NOxteB/Nwx0GR7L2B/VXWthqqjN26AyUEtIX3t1SS3FTVr8 qpJFD/FAJNivRD1s7VH8qf2W0jcQVQ== =FYDR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--