From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5C1138334 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F78FE08D9; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38FC5E085A for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACF0934B4F5; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:13:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Matt Turner Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, licenses Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing References: Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:13:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Matt Turner's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:45:27 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3ff54c4b-ac32-4410-9f94-1a0dffd1318f X-Archives-Hash: bd9a67f7d438ad2fa4f9643dc620caf2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Matt Turner wrote: > Just responding because the absurdity of this angers me, to be honest. > See if you notice anything funny about the URL: > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html What do you mean? Should we localise it, because translations in other languages exist? Sorry, but that's not going to happen. (That said, we have few examples like "lha" where we have both the original (Japanese) and an unofficial English translation. These are in the same file, though.) Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl2Jwg4ACgkQwwkGhRxh wnNV6gf/T+jIu7GDPQ2WgtyamK1o1RR9Ubx7/NrMIdrDYMjh/vS2VW6p5MZUQe64 xaAGOZFDQ9YEZ8fwIEYrRcrKQ9HhEiOOt1wJXBRGUy9sHdmjrVTcCenMBQrsb1KR UUDbrYEKRXwG1vekZRC6nDOltguYMOtC/5Lh7Dg9k27H1JtVM1XO0HoEH3abKO5s g5MmsCa/DpgmIjUrJAp9Vpq9eNCUOh/7xrPDuEd7ATpRwhJli1nuow9y+B0TQZiK B9xpSM7BmrNRvA7U84wJ4ivSa7OPWZOf0X2eDJ7+SuBL3U8atg3xhES0SIJCfWwO 26USWPUfaZmuwb9kxNdLyQEkbvJeWA== =3tYW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--