From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92762138334 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41F74E08E8; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8040E08D0 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FA1B34D7F8; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Francesco Riosa Cc: gentoo development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 8 RFC] Selective fetch/mirror (un-)restriction References: <293656848f42786552da59ad307058d597efa026.camel@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:33:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Francesco Riosa's message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:09:50 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b2b437c8-d344-469b-9e16-f668ec0fc266 X-Archives-Hash: 2902f031eaa6a3377f804cdea95ea86b --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Francesco Riosa wrote: > what about getting rid of RESTRICT="fetch" and manage everything > inside SRC_URI? Would that be technically feasible? Ideally marking > only the not re-distributable download and leaving untouched the > others That would have the disadvantage that mirror and bindist restrictions (which are strongly correlated) would be listed in different places. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl33h48ACgkQwwkGhRxh wnPGLQf9Ej289hCoICb53iUeuYKfEj8zZq81+Frp+Bte0IHSY6nVqmp9srKGz8R3 JFPZJtwggeAkHyffd4kMiQqxoJrbxOoiDa+WvPtgxvM+sqSEbmE9yDLhhvy+zP2Z cMZvUJPiXViun4AtBP8aj3AZ8g3iEY8gCbtsb114hi8l3fWP2VySlQZjVdEKgwhi rwQBOKomPOA3u84Xa1oNr8sW75GA8NM1/AaF45RSdeHpnfpUSqa1ytFWUjNef+9M 0JMtZeSzxh/9n+ywIW3sPh9CDJBuIB3RSkt1Vg4mMOSY4EoU+4q0IoVeUX/THcSR XaNTa5RLtej+GauJbFLiOijXQ2G64Q== =7ytb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--