From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C393A138334 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DFD4E08FC; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34FAE0870 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6982034D9F2; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:34:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Michael Orlitzky Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] elisp{,-common}.eclass update for emacs-vcs consolidation References: <3002c804-e70f-5b50-ee38-d91aa7e22fb0@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:34:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3002c804-e70f-5b50-ee38-d91aa7e22fb0@gentoo.org> (Michael Orlitzky's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:19:17 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 60c3c1a5-1045-4e56-8a6c-d4c2f17c6075 X-Archives-Hash: e12992cf81f98c5798a6946537889127 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> No revbumps will be done for this (and virtual/emacs will be simply >> removed without prior masking). > I guess it's nice that we know ahead of time, but is there any reason > to suspect that this won't cause havoc? Removal of the virtual/emacs ebuilds won't remove the installed package from users' systems. It will eventually disappear, when all its reverse dependencies have been updated. Why would its continued presence as an installed package (for another while) cause any problems? Revbumping its more than 400 reverse dependencies really doesn't sound so attractive, and would cause rebuilds on users' systems for virtually (pun intended :-) no benefit. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl36VRYACgkQwwkGhRxh wnOwVQgAnzJrQK9J7tVfh8xpWG9MDZd/VTETb48f0A5FebludQS3rLiE35gFz5yE rIXnWaD1ny5zk3VTTPTNQbxYlzX7TKlxjzIwc8XzWUmIOQGxi3APS7qTWT8vDVWt vgzWyXvme8+FdMK7jB4+xSj2lFdHrdqh7ufbPeAmx9O/nH5YuzZhUECI+QQKXQK4 Lwh0Xc6PWgHCK88QvQ7WDH9xN7AhjmAKiUcBMdBKiWKz4LplS0+vyjYcVglDySKZ l5uKzQMf4CAgfP+XMZc8VFT+Vo4O3Pp1WvOKw5tay3IFoQymvwvFbWlGAbTqA9wU bTEedP0Efep5B/YjjNQDuy5QINZtbg== =w4EY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--