From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C6A138334 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4A15E08C3; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C24EE0893 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A327E34BAEB; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:07:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mass keywording/stabilisation of ebuilds in app-emacs References: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:07:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:53:23 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 91545ed9-eb69-4811-b430-70c24db118d7 X-Archives-Hash: c1954d92404982794b5e264b3fd20cef --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Wasn't ALLARCHES supposed to be applied only if a previous version had > a stable keyword on the arch in question? I.e. if it has been tested > by arch team at least once? Yes, but the same would apply to most of the elisp code that is shipped with app-editors/emacs itself, for which I doubt that it gets large coverage in arch testing. Either these things are arch independent, then I don't see why they couldn't have the same keywords as emacs itself. Or they are not, then they shouldn't have the allarches label in the first place. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl2fSSkACgkQwwkGhRxh wnNTQQf8Dearp3oMPsS9o8uFBiekTkv0bDuI+/OIjFmJ8zgM8qxDwBHVGR4egN+L BrLCpXX9zbV0oaB6rSKmEvO2XuHuua2BSA/kgEhz4JNbI+Jz7P3nkHDoUbsZX2dl WAAEtDdW23Elx/M/11T76wkOCf5ZGPicTS97XcxSVJw+1G/eukqKrIyszeGxC2G1 H2oeuG4gY8+mZcbx+aku34Ws6X2kGbBemTK9e7FfaTw4NretdV5QqqgT/OgBHG5l ALLutguJ5v+Fi6gujiTGWN6DFEbGb/FoURJR4s4GRiP7zAdPoWHWlA9Ra4yaqVo+ HXAn3kY9aPFUnDogsjxqfYrvV5wIlQ== =qBbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--