>>>>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Michał Górny wrote:

> +in 2⁴ = 16 directories), and each of this directories would have

s/this/these/ (This was there before, but can be corrected while at it.)

> +The implementations are only required to support cutoffs being multiples

s/The implementations/Implementations/

> +and maintaining mirrors via ``emirrordist``.  The implementation
> +supports both listed layouts, with all hash functions supported
> +by Portage and cutoffs being multiples of 4.

In the rationale section, one reason given for the choice of the hash
algorithm (BLAKE2B) was to "avoid code duplication". Isn't that argument
moot, if all hashes supported by Portage are implemented? (Or in other
words, couldn't a faster hash function like MD5 be used?)

Ulrich