From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA43138334 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27285E096B; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3579E090A for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F09F34D78A; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:50:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Michael Orlitzky Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] elisp{,-common}.eclass update for emacs-vcs consolidation References: <3002c804-e70f-5b50-ee38-d91aa7e22fb0@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:50:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Michael Orlitzky's message of "Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:41:39 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 47638669-3b6e-4376-8576-0f4da76a3b24 X-Archives-Hash: d0df84972cf0747810f1303e4ecf9418 >>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > And then you tried to use my suggestion to be extra careful and run a > CI check against me, which is obnoxious, so there you go. Maybe you shouldn't suggest usage of non-free tools (like Github) then? It's everyone's own choice if they want to use such tools, but it certainly cannot be part of any standard workflow.