From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29EDD138334 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1602FE09BB; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850ECE096A for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27B734D51C; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:52:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Michael Orlitzky Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] elisp{,-common}.eclass update for emacs-vcs consolidation References: <3002c804-e70f-5b50-ee38-d91aa7e22fb0@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:52:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Michael Orlitzky's message of "Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:49:53 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 95fdac15-d849-4d8b-bf7a-1852dcf754e7 X-Archives-Hash: c3f5c70bbb1222774b404cf77b2a0cf3 >>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > And for the record, commenting on standards in response to a series of > commits that display low standards is not a personal attack. *shrug* As a matter of fact, I've run that series of commits past the QA lead, who has approved them.