From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD21C138334 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10A41E08E5; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C7EE0884 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99CF034B476; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:37:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, licenses Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] @DISTFILE-REDISTRIBUTABLE license group References: <289b815331e4d29c9cb5bb7e5613e30ab6016806.camel@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:37:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2019 22:00:45 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9ae7a19d-06d7-43ef-a6c9-28b79d5c2a51 X-Archives-Hash: 1064e80012106231a62d466974cafc02 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > That's my initial thought as well but I'm going to check them, just in > case. That is, unless the proposal is rejected. Please check this, before we are going to decide on it. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl2Gih4ACgkQwwkGhRxh wnMMCggAp6BjbpvqSj7b4VyDJwVE50cdX0P4FRAwg3wofhaco0XwbgNUGpFXIUcR IkgC8pu+ZgAubD2fcF8DmPDBXBLiVudpRzev5+CCEo6gihclTMqxXdIpBBbH45IV IOpox5r3nQRRwS0daCQKCWJXIZfv8mGyBZBSEW4NzDr8IXNgXLQoXxPveV4hsoA9 nUpzoCpf4S5cgpKEchzV9aRt1j9uB9TMokD5kcUofQ/hwPo5RUh02oaW1RpUL+F8 o8k1GRYxpSK7QUcJDYO2iudsHz1DP2YRdaxST7UF6UBEqBXfWPDlyy6cObHQBq4c yWqiAKhwCsjsz9KfKJG2XmGVyNXEFg== =gWrc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--