From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53FEC158086 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20BD92BC07A; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51172BC025 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 07:27:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Jonas Stein Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: net-servers In-Reply-To: <2550c02d-b646-589e-a93c-3e5f550686af@gentoo.org> (Jonas Stein's message of "Mon, 20 Dec 2021 01:18:48 +0100") References: <2550c02d-b646-589e-a93c-3e5f550686af@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:27:25 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: 0ed2817e-25ef-44cd-be3f-1b608198b445 X-Archives-Hash: 51c6b34b127b3094c8f2fe6e3b3bbc6c >>>>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Jonas Stein wrote: >> I've been packaging some Gemini protocol servers and clients in ::guru >> overlay, and they all go to net-misc category. I think it would be >> better to split browsers and servers for non-www protocols (like Finger, >> Ident, Gemini and Gopher) into separate categories. > all servers without www servers means, we should move > ssh, imap, pop, mysql... there too I tend to disagree. Anything specific should stay in its category, e.g. FTP servers in net-ftp, IRC servers in net-irc. > I think we need a more precise definition if we do not want this. I wonder if "servers" is a good category, in the first place. A server can be for anything. Ulrich