From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB92D138334 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1100E08A2; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 947DDE088C for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15 (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE17334A794; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:46:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: "Tharrvik ." Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] acct-{user,group}/i2p request for 493 References: Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 20:45:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Sat, 31 Aug 2019 20:41:05 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: be046ab8-bf34-4cae-b877-cca6c0fa5bab X-Archives-Hash: 55b2d69e67e9790ff40d46d2600959cd --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > AFAICS, 484 would be the next free number (when counting down from 499). I just see that i2pd has 470, maybe take the adjacent 471? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEZlHkP3TnuTbxrN0HwwkGhRxhwnMFAl1qwGcACgkQwwkGhRxh wnPwnQf/cr5iC0wuLRehT+EYhP4hNkdbrZMAlnKV22yU8cbiBoVhwR5Uz6HooiD5 /3E4OSacmOJwVN+kWMJr/sX2gm6eY7iT/P06XDfnn6wVXurd4B126cW/a+sYa9Cg UZx9U2JP31ytxnqYe4PgSMD5FeMQwDMm9xE9C6XCRssSUWjvO5/yDblScAQY/Mog 1RDZErgUljIlpO3z29VmnEIsxLQM/mEQcMcq+ZhE8OInKEP4sLeMnJj7tRPs9n5I y4YEMkyRykje+t0CEOzXz9TdrnjcZStbt0yO1F+xsDeZnSLISvw9K9NJEx569eYX MD3+AoS3ZhV2DfXgteRBUTelJ4QX8g== =BBlB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--