From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982B615800A for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D3A6E083B; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from latitanza.investici.org (latitanza.investici.org [82.94.249.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2239FE0817 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx3.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by latitanza.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4R8LGW3Wt6zGp02 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:13:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inventati.org; s=stigmate; t=1690157587; bh=FI4RDfuugu147QbL7GmUgyBq5wZVnVRVDCRw6KwZ8yc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ROj0sws/RT97LMOn50E7mt+2qqcZEn7NAwcJMwcrw0aVygY0GA9vwMzzueyHu9gTZ cFKuEiv3+3wuo087adjOn12Kg+Hngxvr/I7/JE9PP91qMmAgwMLM1zo/PeB/gsOj6L ZEGTf59cEKpsJsiXyFm/PRyvJEfgET2HcrBRP+/g= Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:13:13 -0400 From: Violet Purcell To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile? Message-ID: References: <67566f1b-4aa9-15e4-4e72-3def6ff26ce6@woodpecker.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 720b83b0-7e7b-4749-a8b0-43002433fef8 X-Archives-Hash: d8742327cabfa2b07e7a8cf378e67a09 On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:11:51PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Andrey Grozin wrote: > > > OK, sbcl is masked on musl. But why clisp, ecls, or gcl cannot be used > > in the amd64 musl profile? > > > (I don't know if they actually work on amd64 musl systems, or if > > anybody ever tried to do so. I just ask a formal question about Gentoo > > profiles system.) > > pkgcheck's mesage was this: > > RequiredUseDefaults: version 5.47.0: profile: 'default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl' (3 total) failed REQUIRED_USE: ( clisp || clozurecl || clozurecl64 || cmucl || ecls || gcl || sbcl ) > > I think what happens is this: sbcl is masked on musl, but it is the only > version that is enabled in the ebuild by the IUSE="+sbcl" default. > Therefore, none of the versions available on musl is enabled there, > resulting in an unsatisfied REQUIRED_USE. > > Moving the + from sbcl to e.g. clisp would get rid of the message, but > maybe this is not an acceptable solution. > > Ulrich Hi! As of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/30752, sbcl is no longer masked on musl, however it seems that sbcl never got removed from use.mask. I'll make a PR to fix this ASAP. - Violet