From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5450158086 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 23:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A56EEE0874; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 23:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3955E085A for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 23:37:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Thomas Deutschmann Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Don't use UIDs and GIDs below 100 without QA approval In-Reply-To: <0890a89e-2d43-8889-6bbb-decad15b0a2e@gentoo.org> (Thomas Deutschmann's message of "Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:15:36 +0100") References: <0890a89e-2d43-8889-6bbb-decad15b0a2e@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:37:01 +0100 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ec5a35bf-fd69-4602-aff1-3c6cf99c8d60 X-Archives-Hash: ff9bcd2ebaf11a91716dcb2b2fd4f465 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2021-11-11 11:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> We could: >> - Open some part of the range between 500 and 1000. For example, >> 500..799, which would leave 200 IDs for dynamic allocation. >> - Open part of the range 60001..65533. Not sure if all software will >> be happy with that. >> - Admit that the concept of static allocation has failed, and return >> to dynamic allocation. > Only the third option is really possible. > The first option (500-1000) would be technically possible but would > clash with knowledge people gained in the past and would violate LPIC=20 > (=3Dmaking Gentoo even more special and unusable for companies relying > on certifications). Why would that be? We chose the original split point quite arbitrarily to be 500. What is different about adjusting it upwards now? Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmGRnZ0PHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4u3BEH/jAzdTspIuJPNBd5t1XRNjSyVZ5nUEtyfXZh sz/wNzyay0VV6YOKLLMBdXpYgC/VgXAOhKCr/qAyWD1fZ7SoieWPYCwKrpC3bw4P LmUyO2L7/yoguycQDaO3NhruJQedeyCJowhpQqNkr5QZKYRgSRrCfqu75VScSvY6 N2WQ0RGniSjbK6OVMutRiZUBFx590JgdVckvUBSoBNpeeOkKtK0ePfQJidwBhW8w X1HsglSNUgD0i6eLj5i3k15liXMT1lyTN07OqkVojZL0d4DmfgJGiuNeS7zmSo2V ATQH2mFzMK1OMPSKYps8ElTpGp9vCFni2tIDMuVWRCD1YJbI4hs= =5O1d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--