From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FF715800A for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A988AE07DB; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A736E07A9 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:12:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Andrey Grozin Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] are there any lisps in the default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl profile? In-Reply-To: (Andrey Grozin's message of "Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:41:21 +0000 (UTC)") References: <67566f1b-4aa9-15e4-4e72-3def6ff26ce6@woodpecker.gentoo.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 12:11:51 +0200 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 50286fe9-35ea-4a7c-ac10-7582f8e71cb9 X-Archives-Hash: 263a466d95f4c898cbad5ec965ed5ef3 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Andrey Grozin wrote: > OK, sbcl is masked on musl. But why clisp, ecls, or gcl cannot be used > in the amd64 musl profile? > (I don't know if they actually work on amd64 musl systems, or if > anybody ever tried to do so. I just ask a formal question about Gentoo > profiles system.) pkgcheck's mesage was this: RequiredUseDefaults: version 5.47.0: profile: 'default/linux/amd64/17.0/musl' (3 total) failed REQUIRED_USE: ( clisp || clozurecl || clozurecl64 || cmucl || ecls || gcl || sbcl ) I think what happens is this: sbcl is masked on musl, but it is the only version that is enabled in the ebuild by the IUSE="+sbcl" default. Therefore, none of the versions available on musl is enabled there, resulting in an unsatisfied REQUIRED_USE. Moving the + from sbcl to e.g. clisp would get rid of the message, but maybe this is not an acceptable solution. Ulrich --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmS8/OcPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uf34H/2sM1ygFpIWeg+OQCC3JrTwcPLCjxOEG5NB3 1wv9MTy1qSRMYf4GUWGHvx5czXY01YWBdm9DQfVsGBPREpfTcqRoiHaCqcUTu5fv lOfZ5osiG9D+6S/pL3OTpHGyENuHLSydYh4KIE5b0LRtatfQsznhjfT6TG1NLJLt OiZWwpbJJ2th1NY7CWcP/hrjioTyQAq+fl/t33SjjWbb+bAT4AaVPHFHoykqgmff GzL2NjyfL3I+iBPHTL7/APo/NuKoKw6Fb8k+KAO2B0DT2y14BtAJirQGoFcFliGH CkZX0MQAGeW2GTdXoCz91TY1F8nap3UPUHmlozl+ai82naWwqRg= =WtmQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--