From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D34158089 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55ECE2BC18F; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1960B2BC017 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:55:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Ulrich Mueller To: Florian Schmaus Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Alexander Neuwirth Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml upstream docs as reference to scientific publications/papers In-Reply-To: <1a4e3c3d-6f4a-88d0-b390-4a261019eb27@gentoo.org> (Florian Schmaus's message of "Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:28:42 +0200") References: <9bbf6506-3a30-3423-855c-6f42e67c3be0@neuwirth-informatik.de> <1a4e3c3d-6f4a-88d0-b390-4a261019eb27@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 22:55:30 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 587d2066-6620-42ec-8b56-935861a828ba X-Archives-Hash: 183c0219feb3317b8a760dace94c58a9 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > > sounds perfectly fine. Don't use an attribute if you can put the information in the (otherwise empty) element. Especially, when other elements like already do it that way. > It would require (minor) adjustments to the schema and DTD. Also an update of GLEP 68, in the first place. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmUHZ8IPHHVsbUBnZW50 b28ub3JnAAoJEFGIM1CIQV4uQIMIAKbhdl0fBZXO+xwdMOv5olZ5/UL6G056ZgGJ HROnPfFYyDyb5+SJHEkq6gJPD371sV7q17WMCPF+rY0OS+5oZX1J1RMqh7LsIKJb 5yK73w2YFKvmEl7ief1dxkDnlEor4MhFn75jpcYui+g3KaePtHSKHRwPOgx5lGF9 PpxDeuWnhUePzACg68UtxJnftKiySF+ss+VutBhIgCc9HgIqeRs9ZEblbPjfhMjE 19rGL/2HKQSvlgUAOZSsjDwNc4cR4xGTCReebHb0d6GVKkNDuTQ3anKqKPVsuoNv ZT8HZes5rhydUltoWIWbB5KzRAHeAj2zadZVi1KgJ6P027PYq5s= =OMD1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--