>>>>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021, Florian Schmaus wrote:

>> We could:
>> - Open some part of the range between 500 and 1000. For example,
>> 500..799, which would leave 200 IDs for dynamic allocation.

> +1, since I am not aware of any significant downsides doing so.

> Could you elaborate why the range 500-799 only leaves us with 200 IDs?

We still need some range for dynamic allocation. Currently that is
500..999, and would be reduced to 800..999. That seems to be on the low
side already.

In any case, 300 additional IDs may not be future proof at the rate
we're currently allocating them. So I wonder if we shouldn't move to
above 60000 immediately, or alternatively, give up the whole concept.

Ulrich