* [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer
@ 2020-10-05 14:51 Aaron W. Swenson
2020-10-05 15:08 ` Aaron W. Swenson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aaron W. Swenson @ 2020-10-05 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]
Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a couple things,
but that's managed by checkpath in the init script.
So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think someone else
is asking for 384) or 463.
Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID.
Which UID should we use: 383 or 463?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer
2020-10-05 14:51 [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer Aaron W. Swenson
@ 2020-10-05 15:08 ` Aaron W. Swenson
2020-10-05 16:28 ` Ulrich Mueller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aaron W. Swenson @ 2020-10-05 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 523 bytes --]
On 2020-10-05 10:51, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a couple things,
> but that's managed by checkpath in the init script.
>
> So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think someone else
> is asking for 384) or 463.
>
> Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID.
>
> Which UID should we use: 383 or 463?
And, I'm seeing my list was slightly out of date as 383 is now taken. So, which
UID should we use: 379 or 463?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer
2020-10-05 15:08 ` Aaron W. Swenson
@ 2020-10-05 16:28 ` Ulrich Mueller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2020-10-05 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 698 bytes --]
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020, Aaron W Swenson wrote:
> On 2020-10-05 10:51, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>> Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a
>> couple things, but that's managed by checkpath in the init script.
>>
>> So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think
>> someone else is asking for 384) or 463.
>>
>> Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID.
>>
>> Which UID should we use: 383 or 463?
> And, I'm seeing my list was slightly out of date as 383 is now taken.
> So, which UID should we use: 379 or 463?
Either is fine. The guidelines recommend taking the next free one
available which would be 463.
Ulrich
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 507 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-05 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-05 14:51 [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer Aaron W. Swenson
2020-10-05 15:08 ` Aaron W. Swenson
2020-10-05 16:28 ` Ulrich Mueller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox