From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from bashful.cdf.toronto.edu (bashful.cdf.toronto.edu [128.100.31.157]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FD4ABD51 for ; Wed, 1 May 2002 23:49:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bashful.cdf.toronto.edu (Postfix, from userid 191) id E779B4005CF; Thu, 2 May 2002 00:48:56 -0400 (EDT) To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org From: Arcady Genkin Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking latest ALSA modules References: <3CD162EA@epostleser.online.no> X-Face: 0=A/O5-+sE[Tf%X>rYr?Y5LD4,:^'jaJ!4jC&UR*ZrrK2>^`g22Qeb]!:d;}2YJ|Hq"LHdF OX`jWX|AT-WVFQ(TPhFVak)0nt$aEdlOq=1~D,:\z5QlVOrZ2(H,mKg=Xr|'VlHA="r Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:48:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3CD162EA@epostleser.online.no> (a-mellin's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:25:50 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i686-pc-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: aaf540c7-58eb-42ae-959e-25f48fc1e547 X-Archives-Hash: 481056ae28b0068983424df0859dd4e4 a-mellin writes: > I tried the new alsa-driver,alsa-utils and alsa-libs, but when I > had them installed, I couldn`t load the modules or set the mixer, > due to a "double" installation. There was a little mess with package version numbering. If you update the package.mask file to the latest CVS version, this should no longer happen for you. If it does, please file detailed bug reports. > So I removed the old 0.5.* packages, but then gnome(2) and gnome > apps wouldn`t start because they missed something like > libasound.so.1... Technically, 0.9 installs a symlink libasound.so.1 -> libasound.so.2, and this is supposed to work. -- Arcady Genkin