From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from bashful.cdf.toronto.edu (bashful.cdf.toronto.edu [128.100.31.157]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC6820ED9F0 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:48:12 -0600 (CST) Received: by bashful.cdf.toronto.edu (Postfix, from userid 191) id 6E2A044011E; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:42:57 -0500 (EST) To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Point of fact. References: <23DFAA462CC6A64487613B0E242D9FF706EBB4@mercury.phoenix-interactive.com> X-Face: 0=A/O5-+sE[Tf%X>rYr?Y5LD4,:^'jaJ!4jC&UR*ZrrK2>^`g22Qeb]!:d;}2YJ|Hq"LHdF OX`jWX|AT-WVFQ(TPhFVak)0nt$aEdlOq=1~D,:\z5QlVOrZ2(H,mKg=Xr|'VlHA="r From: Arcady Genkin Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 13:42:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <23DFAA462CC6A64487613B0E242D9FF706EBB4@mercury.phoenix-interactive.com> (Sean Mitchell's message of "Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:55:18 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i686-pc-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: be912f5a-47fd-4938-bfc5-06d4a2e0191f X-Archives-Hash: 299e5dbc72b0b02478ebd0fd09fea97e Sean Mitchell writes: > I like grub, but I've had much more success with lilo. I don't think that we have an issue here. I have never used grub, and I got lilo working under Gentoo quite trivially, without any problems. It's not like the users don't have a choice... -- Arcady Genkin Don't read everything you believe.